Why Real Name Verification is Required to Open a Cryptocurrency Exchange Account

Many users feel resistance when encountering mandatory identity verification processes during registration on cryptocurrency exchanges. Taking my own experience as an example, when the platform requires facial recognition, questions arise in my mind: Isn't the anonymity and censorship resistance that cryptocurrency initially touted? Why is it necessary to submit real identity when purchasing digital assets now? Even more concerning is whether asset transfers after real-name verification mean that everything is traceable? Reflecting on cases where ransomware publicly disclosed Bitcoin addresses but were difficult to trace, this sense of contradiction becomes even stronger.

After completing mobile binding, ID card upload, and Google email verification on the exchange, the core concerns focus on two points: What is the real purpose of the platform collecting personal information? Is there a risk of data resale? These worries are not unfounded, as privacy protection has always been a core demand for users in the digital asset field.

Decoding the Underlying Logic of Exchange KYC Verification#

This article will analyze the real-name verification mechanism of exchanges from multiple perspectives and explore the key points of user privacy protection. First, let us focus on two classic cases that shocked the industry:

Case One: HSBC's $1.9 Billion Fine
Mexican and Colombian drug cartels laundered over $10 billion through the bank, which also provided financial services to terrorist organizations and sanctioned countries like Iran and North Korea. Case Two: Standard Chartered's $132 Million Regulatory Penalty
Due to loopholes in the anti-money laundering system, criminal groups successfully laundered $265 billion in dirty money. These two cases reveal the iron law of financial regulation—licensed institutions must build a robust anti-money laundering (AML) system, or they will face devastating penalties.

For cryptocurrency exchanges, the fiat deposit and withdrawal channels make them high-risk areas for money laundering. If the platform has not established a strict KYC mechanism, it will face threefold risks:

Inability to provide user traceability data when criminal authorities pursue accountability
Judicial freezing of funds accounts due to the inflow of dirty money
Regulatory revocation of licenses ending operational qualifications

This is precisely the fundamental reason why mainstream exchanges insist on multiple verifications—to prevent criminal funds from contaminating the trading system and to ensure the platform's compliance and survival.

Analysis of the Dual Defense of Privacy Protection#

Although exchanges have motives for data protection (reputation is a lifeline), users still need to build their own protective systems:

System Risk Prevention:

Operator data monitoring: There is a possibility of information leakage from the operator during the mobile SMS verification stage
VPN backdoor threats: Free VPNs may steal device data and transaction records
Email security vulnerabilities: Although Google email is relatively secure, two-factor authentication should still be enabled

Platform Selection Strategy:

Prioritize licensed institutions (e.g., OKX holds licenses in Dubai/Singapore)
Verify the authenticity of licenses (beware of MSB licenses that can be purchased for $20,000)
Pay attention to technological investment (cold storage ratio, privacy computing applications, etc.)

Global mainstream platforms' compliance progress:

OKX: Fully licensed in multiple countries in the Middle East and Southeast Asia
Binance: Global operation center established in Abu Dhabi
Bitget: Strategic investment in Hong Kong licensed institution OSL
Bybit: Officially authorized by the Dutch central bank

For investors who have not yet established accounts, it is recommended to prioritize platforms with outstanding compliance:

1. OKX or Alternative Entry #

Asset Management: $17.1 billion (Q1 2025 audit data)
Trading Variety: 620 trading pairs (including 25 emerging assets)
Liquidity Performance: $16.05 billion/day (dominating the Asian market)
Core Advantage: Early investment from Silicon Valley guru Tim Draper, integrated trading across spot/contract/options, and continuously expanding self-developed OKB Chain ecosystem.

2. Binance #

Asset Management: $12.85 billion (continuous net inflow)
Trading Depth: 780 trading pairs (38 newly listed coins)
Market Share: Daily transaction volume of $19 billion (global first in liquidity)
Technical Features: CEX/DEX hybrid architecture, BNB Chain ecosystem covering 2000+ projects, institutional-level API trading system.

欧易编辑部